Pages Menu
TwitterRssFacebook
Categories Menu

Posted by on Jun 14, 2013 in Medical Journals |

Primary role of multiparametric flow cytometry in the diagnostic work-up of indolent clonal mast cell disorders.

Head for The Masto Townhall forum to debate this paper.
This article may be copyrighted. Notice to copyright holders.
You can view the full article at the publisher here
This is a free article and no fee is due to download it.
Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2011 Nov;80(6):362-8. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.20606. Epub 2011 Jun 8.

Primary role of multiparametric flow cytometry in the diagnostic work-up of indolent clonal mast cell disorders.

Perbellini O, Zamò A, Colarossi S, Zampieri F, Zoppi F, Bonadonna P, Schena D, Artuso A, Martinelli G, Chilosi M, Pizzolo G, Zanotti R.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

According to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification the diagnosis of systemic mastocytosis (SM) relies on bone marrow (BM) examination and is based on one major and four minor criteria. Herein, we used WHO criteria to compare flow cytometry (FC) with other available techniques in the diagnosis of SM after BM examination.

METHODS:

We analyzed a cohort of 95 patients with suspect SM. All patients underwent comprehensive BM examination by using cytology, immunohistochemistry, FC and molecular study for mutation of c-Kit and serum tryptase dosage. FC evaluation was based on a combination of monoclonal antibodies, specifically CD25/CD2/CD45/CD34/CD117.

RESULTS:

Seventy-four out of ninety-five patients were diagnosed with indolent SM (n = 59) or monoclonal mast cell activation syndrome (n = 15) because satisfying less than 3 minor criteria. Thirty-nine out of these seventy-four patients fulfilled the major histological criterion, whereas the presence of a minor criterion was assessed by FC, molecular study, cytology, and tryptase level in 70/74, 52/67, 56/74, and 42/74 patients, respectively. FC showed higher sensitivity than IHC in detection of CD25+ mast cells (MC) (92.9% vs. 73.8%; P = 0.019), especially in the absence of the major histological criterion (90.5% vs. 47.6%; P = 0.003). Moreover, CD2 expression was documented by FC and IHC in 97.1% and 35.3% of cases, respectively (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

FC showed the best sensitivity for identifying abnormal MC compared to other techniques, especially in cases with low MC burden. Therefore, we hope for a major role of FC in the diagnostic work-up of clonal MC disorders.

2011 International Clinical Cytometry Society.

PMID: 21656905 [PubMed – indexed for MEDLINE] Free full text